Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Android App Spotlight #14: Ratio

Price: $4.99
AppBrain
Website

Michael Ruhlman's book Ratio isn't so much a cookbook as it is a template from which basic foods can be made. Want to make cookie dough? You'll need 1 part sugar, 2 parts fat, and 3 parts flour. Looking for a brine? All you need is 20 parts water and 1 part salt. I'm of the inclination that cookbooks and their recipes are merely starting points from which consumers should expand upon now that they know the backbone of the recipe, and Ratio takes away the crutch of the recipe altogether. It's a more advanced cookbook - you're going to have to use your knowledge of cooking to get the flavors - but you'll at least have the elemental composition, provided you use the correct ratio. I've never read the book - though the Amazon page for it has a positive writeup from Alton Brown, which is good enough for me - but the app serves as a condensed form of all this information, providing the golden ratios for a couple dozen foods, from batters to fat-based sauces, provides a calculator to provide you with the exact amounts needed depending on how many people are being served, as well as a short narrative expanding upon the ratio and sometimes providing suggestions for flavoring.

There's an appeal to recipes - follow them to the letter, and your efforts will be rewarded - but at best, it serves only as a showcase for your manual skills and ability to follow directions. You shouldn't really consider yourself a cook unless you are able to expand or modify recipes, or even make up some of your own from scratch. This app will help you in the latter respect, though you'll have to work at it.

Monday, July 26, 2010

Android App Spotlight #13: Chrome to Phone

(Android 2.2 only)

Price: Free
Website

One of the many Froyo features introduced at Google I/O was the "cloud to device messanging," a way to send information to your phone from your browser. While it's not a highly publicized aspect now that Froyo is beginning its rollout, there is a way to get your browser to talk to your phone (provided you use Chrome) with the Chrome to Phone extension and app.

It's pretty simple to get going - install the extension, and install the app. If you're on an ordinary website, clicking the extension will send the URL to your phone, and the browser will automatically open and navigate to it. If you're getting directions on Google Maps on your browser, when your phone receives the information, it will open the Maps app withe the destination plugged in and ready to go. In the latter case, it unfortunately only sends the destination, and leaves the routing to the app, so you can't alter a route in Maps on the computer, and transfer it to the app. Transfer times seemed a little slow in my testing, taking anywhere from one to ten minutes before the phone got the information, though others haven't had such lag.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Android App Spotlight #12: Fast Web Installer

Price: Free
AppBrain Link

I've already lauded the benefits of using AppBrain over the stock Android Market, but it was a bit inconvenient to have to open the app and sync your installs to the server every time you wanted to install something. The folks at AppBrain have solved this problem with their Fast Web Installer. Once installed, whenever you click "install" on an app while browsing AppBrain's site, the app automatically starts downloading and installing on your phone. It works nearly flawlessly, though you still have to manually install paid apps. And to think, iPhone users have to connect their phones to the computer whenever they want to install apps!

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Let's Make a Texas Playlist with No Stupid Country Music

I was listening to Band of Horses' single Laredo and feeling nostalgic about San Antonio when I started wondering how many other songs about Texas or its cities I had in my music library. Turns out, there are quite a few, and it created a pretty cool cross section of songs, without the need for any silly country music.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Mission: Spice Rack

Spices
I like collecting spices. My mother has a limited mishmash of spices and blends, and it's frustrating when you're working on a recipe, and you go to look for a particular spice only to find - darn it! - you didn't have it, leaving you to either go off the rails and try a substitution that may completely change the flavor of the dish, or omit it all together, which also may completely change the flavor of the dish. Once I got a place of my own, I decided to always be prepared, and maintain a spice collection that may seem large in comparison to others.

While I like spices, I really don't like spice racks. They trade functionality for flash, and take up valuable counter space, especially when you need a lot of them. You also have to think about future expansion - will I be able to find another one of these ornate racks when I run out of space in my current model. And lest we forget how fast a spice's potency can deteriorate when exposed to direct sunlight.


The Problem
This was my first spice rack, the KitchenArt Spice Carousel, which I chose because my mother had three of them lying around and it didn't cost me anything. It was neat to have the ability to stack more than one rack, and the bottoms rotated to give you an instant 1/4 tsp dose. They were a little hard to clean, though, the design was a bit bland, and every time I wanted a new one, I had to spend $25 on one on Amazon - which is still cheap in spice rack terms (though, in retrospect, not as more expensive than I originally thought). At my max, I had five carousels, and was procrastinating on buying the sixth. The KitchenArt got the jobs done well enough, so I couldn't really justify looking into other spice solutions until my recent move, when I was attempting to clean the containers by soaking them in soapy water. The container previously containing tumeric still had enough residue to dye the plastic of every other container a yellowish tint. Into the garbage they went, and I needed something new to do with my spices.

The Solution
As I typically do for kitchen advice, I turn to Alton Brown and the spice rack he uses on Good Eats, which is to say, not a rack at all but tin jars attached to Velcro strips on the inside of the cupboard doors. Certainly an elegant solution, but it seemed like the process would be a little more complicated than I was willing to get into. Even other people that have shared their experiences online often go with a different but similar solution:


Magnets, How Do They Work?
People seem more inclined to use magnetic-based solutions. It seems easier - get the tins, slap a magnet on the bottom, and attach. The only problem is the attaching surface, which either has to be the fridge or a piece of metal that's somehow attached to another surface, like that cupboard door. Looking for the easiest option, I initially went with a magnetic option, too.

Equipment
They already make magnetic spice tins. Problem is, they cost $3 f'n dollars apiece at Bed, Bath, and Beyond, and online resources weren't producing much better results. This was much too high for the 50-60 tins I required for my rack. I instead chose to buy my own tins online for $.75 per unit and put my own dang magnets on there.

I wasn't sure where to find adhesive magnets, so I ended up in the crafts section of Wal-Mart, where I found a roll of magnetic tape that was about an inch wide. It was easy enough to cut a piece the circumference of the tin, and it stuck to the fridge easily enough, but there was a problem: the magnetic tape raised the tin up about a quarter of an inch. If the tin was tilted in either of the directions that didn't have the tape on it, all magnetic connection to the fridge was lost and the tin would fall, bringing any other tins that may be perched beneath them along for the ride. I couldn't trust this approach, especially when cramming sixty tins onto the side of a fridge meant that I had to be careful when removing and replacing tins. This won't do.

Wal-Mart also had magnet sheets for pictures, with adhesive on one side and a magnet on the other. It was flatter, not raising the tins as high off the fridge, and I used an Exacto knife to cut the full surface area of the tin, so there's 100% coverage. Unfortunately, even the magnet wasn't strong enough, once again causing a tidal wave of tins to fall to my kitchen floor, and I still had the overcrowded fridge issue.

Velcro Again

Fine, I'll use the stupid Velcro and risk damage to the inside of my cupboards from the Velcro adhesive. I went to Home Depot and found a roll of Velcro Sticky Back - the one with the picture of the very thing I'm trying to do on the box. It was a simple thing then to measure out some strips and slap them on the cupboard.

The good thing about the Velcro is that placements can be more imprecise - as long as a reasonable amount of the Velcro connected, the thing will stick. Also, the inside of the cabinet allows me a little more room. A couple of weeks in, and it's working pretty well. The entire thing cost about $65, it doesn't use counter space, and by keeping the spices in the dark, it maintains the longevity of the spices. This Alton Brown guy knows a thing or two.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Online Relationships

Recently, I've been thinking about a friend who was deciding to join an online dating site based upon the success of another friend. I couldn't fathom this working for me, not on a romantic level, but a relationship one - I couldn't see myself even doing this for a platonic online interaction. I think there's a couple of reasons why.

The internet can be a very compartmentalized place - I'm interested in cooking, so I'll visit the food blogs, and I'm interested in tech, so I'll visit some tech forums, but I don't go to the cooking blogs and comment on technology, because people are probably not interested in that, and I won't be able to obtain the discussions I'm looking for. I sort of extrapolate that to my entire online presence - I purposefully accentuate the aspects of my personality that I want to represent me - things like my hobbies and my writing - and downplay or outright hide other aspects - like my employment. These practices are grounded from my older experiences with the anonymous internet, but with the popularity of the social web, more and more people who wouldn't necessarily take an active participation online (like my parents) are getting into the game (like Facebook), and I don't think it occurs to them to represent themselves in any manner other than who they really are. I've even been wary of friending people I've met in real life on Facebook before getting a chance to know them, because of the incongruity between my largely-established online persona, and my slow-developing physical relationship.

I'm an active participant in Yelp, and I enjoy writing my reviews. Once you become one of the site's more active participants in the community, you gain an "elite" status, and in larger cities, Yelp sponsors parties featuring free food, drink, and gifts, called Elite Events, where you have the chance to meet with all of your online friends. Luckily, I moved from San Antonio before we started doing these things, because I would have avoided them as much as possible - I have maybe one common interest with these people, and I'm going to try and carry a conversation with them? It's way too much work, and honestly, I didn't like them enough to consider a relationship outside of my established environment to be anything worthwhile.

The other pitfall of communication online is sharing too much. I had a dear friend which the closest aspects of our relationship were cultivated in the tubes due to there being less of a risk to typing secret or embarrassing things online rather than saying it to their face. At first, it was great - I was telling her things I've never told anyone before or since, and it strengthened the bond between us knowing that I could trust her with these things . It became a crutch, though - and I fell susceptible to oversharing - not the kind of oversharing you may see in status messages in Facebook or Twitter (whatever your stupid kid is doing) (the sandwich you ate for lunch), but abusing the emotional aspect of the relationship as a means for attention or establishing dialog. It eventually corrupted the friendship, and since then I've been very reserved about sharing or complaining too much online, largely because I've realized that no one cares about my feelings. I don't say this in a self-deprecating way, mind you - it's just at best boring and at worst absolutely annoying to have someone whine all the time, and it doesn't really foster any relationships. Today, I realize that sharing content is a much better way to create these relationships, though it takes more effort than being an attention whore. Moving from an emotional-based perspective to a content-based one is more useful to the internet as a whole.

Many people alter their real world personalities depending on with whom they're interacting, even varying from friend to friend, so it would make sense that their online persona would again contained altered behavior that they wouldn't normally share in reality, keeping everyone in their separate little areas - this is how I act with my work friends, this is how I act with my family friends, etc. - and then there are those that are more of one note and try and rectify all of their little worlds together. For those people, breaking the virtual wall with new people online is an easy thing. For people like me, not so much. I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing, but more importantly I think it's interesting to consider the dynamic between those who choose to go online to escape from themselves and those who use it as a way to cultivate what they already have. If it is a generational occurrence, or the result of more non-technical users participating, it will be interesting to see how we represent ourselves ten years from now when an online presence is a necessary part of society.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Android App Spotlight #11: Mario Live Wallpaper

Price: Free
AppBrain Link
Website

I saw this on Gizmodo a couple of weeks ago, but I finally got around to installing it today. I have one blank homescreen, and I use it to watch this thing run. I've been staring at it for ten minutes. I can't look away. You bet your ass I'm disabling it once it leaves my dock, though.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Dinner Tonight: Bacon Cheeseburger Soup

After an interesting but ultimately very disappointing hamburger soup at a recent dinner, I started thinking about the elements of a cheeseburger, and how they would be incorporated into soup form.

Hamburger - obviously ground beef would get the job done, but I didn't like how the meat separated into tiny meaty bits floating in the liquid. I want a big bite of meat with my soup. So, with the need for large pieces of meat comes with more consideration for the cooking method. The soups and stews of old would just throw everything into a pot and cook until overdone, but that really misses several opportunities to introduce flavor into the dish. Stew cooking is slow cooking, so we need a cut with a lot of connective tissue, giving the low heat time to break down and become unctuous. My mind went back to Alton Brown's beef stew recipe (which is really a goulash recipe), and I chose to braise boneless short ribs in a similar fashion. As to the braising liquid, I initially wanted to replace the tomato paste with mustard, but I was worried that three pounds of mustardy short rib pieces might be a little strong. I decided to do half with mustard, and the other half with ketchup, thereby keeping half safely similar to the original recipe, and the dual mustard-ketchup interplay was interesting. The meat is the most important part of the hamburger, so it should be the base of the soup, too. It was either chicken or beef stock, and beef had to be the way to go.

Cheese - I thought it would be nice to add some shredded cheese to the liquid, but I wasn't sure if it was possible to add only a limited amount such that it adds flavor, but not a whole hog cheese soup consistency. I was going to try it, and some Wisconsin cheddar seem like a good choice.

Onion - Though a mirepoix eventually found its way into the base, it wasn't planned initially, so I was thinking about adding the onion in a manner similar to French onion soup. Some butter-caramelized onions will provide some sweetness and add get the job done.

Tomato and Pickle - These elements are best enjoyed fresh and cold on a burger, so I chose to save them as a garnish rather than throw them into the pot.

Lettuce - Also best cold, but not very flavorful, so it would either be used very sparingly along with the tomato and pickle, or thrown in like corned beef and cabbage. I chose the latter.

Potatoes - Why not throw the fries into the pot, too? Frying seemed a little unnecessary, especially since any crispy texture would be lost after submersion. I chose a simple browning before adding them in.

Bacon - Everything's better with bacon, and I had some extra laying around, so it's going in.

I didn't use any bun representation. The best I could come up with was similar to - again - French onion soup, with a crouton on top, and the cheese could make its appearance there, but I decided against it.

So here's the final recipe:
  • 3 pounds boneless short ribs, cut into 1-inch cubes
  • 1 white onion, diced
  • 1 yellow onion, Frenched
  • 1 red onion, Frenched 
  • 2 carrots, diced
  • 2 stalks celery, diced
  • 5 ounces sharp cheddar cheese, grated
  • 2 large Russet potatoes, julienned
  • 1 hothouse tomato, seeded and diced
  • 4 dill pickle spears, seeded and diced
  • 5 thick cut pieces of bacon, sliced into 1-inch pieces
  • 1/2 head medium-sized head of lettuce, sliced thinly
  • 1/2 cup apple cider vinegar (divided)
  • 3 teaspoons Worcestershire sauce (divided)
  • 2 teaspoons dried parsley (divided)
  • 2 teaspoons granulated garlic (divided)
  • 1 teaspoon dried oregano (divided)
  • 1 bay leaf
  • 3 sprigs fresh thyme
  • 1/4 cup ketchup
  • 1/4 cup whole-ground mustard
  • 2 quarts beef stock
  • 4 teaspoon kosher salt
  • 3 tablespoons vegetable oil
  • 2 tablespoons butter
In a medium-sized mixing bowl, combine half of the vinegar, Worcestershire sauce, parsley, oregano, garlic, all of the ketchup, and whisk to combine. In a separate bowl, combine the remaining amounts of each of the ingredients, along with all of the mustard, and whisk to combine.


Add 1 tablespoon of vegetable oil to a heavy-bottomed pan over medium heat until a drop of water dances when placed in the pan. Sear the pieces of meat on all sides. Toss half of the meat with the ketchup mixture, and half with the mustard mixture. Wrap the meat in heavy duty aluminum foil, and place inside a 250 degree oven for 4 hours.

In a fry pan, melt the butter over medium low heat. Add the red and yellow onions, a heavy pinch of salt, and sweat until golden brown, 30-45 minutes.

In a stockpot, heat 1 tablespoon of vegetable oil, add the diced carrots, onion, celery, a pinch of salt, and sweat until soft. Add the beef stock, bay leaf, and thyme, and simmer for thirty minutes. Remove the bay leaf and thyme from the pot and discard. Using an immersion blender, blend the stock and vegetables until smooth. Add the cheese in handfuls, making sure the previous handful has melted completely before adding the next. Blend again if desired. Add the sweated onions and stir to combine. Reduce the heat to low and cover, stirring occasionally.

Add 1 tablespoon of vegetable oil to a fry pan and brown the potatoes. You may have to work in batches depending on the size of the pan. Once browned, add to stock pot along with the lettuce.

Cook the bacon pieces in a fry pan over medium-low heat. Drain and set aside.

After the meat is finished, remove from oven, open the foil packages, and add meat to stockpot. Salt and pepper to taste.

Serve the soup garnished with the tomatoes, pickles, and bacon.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My only regrets are not using the juices from the meat packages (though they may have provided too much of a mustardy and ketchupy flavor), and not using the bacon fat for anything (although I used it to make a vinaigrette and eat with the remaining lettuce). Also, while I know that a mealy red potato would have had an easier time staying together in the pot, I like the starchy ones better. Still, I may go back to a red potato next time, because it was hard browning the white potatoes without them falling apart a little bit. Otherwise, I thought it was a pretty solid soup, and only one of a handful of recipes that I've thought out from beginning to end (the only other that comes to mind is my should-be-award-winning chili). And I cannot stress enough how much better this soup was than the one I had at that restaurant. So much better.